Internal Due Date: 07-01-2016 Contact Lucy Grantham for details
Foundation Due Date: 11-01-2016
Number of Applications: 4
What Keck Wants
Research Field: The Keck Foundation Research Program seeks to benefit humanity by supporting projects in two research areas—medical research and science and engineering research—that are distinctive and novel in their approach, question the prevailing paradigm, or have the potential to break open new territory in their field. Both Senior and Early Career investigators are encouraged to apply. Keck is most interested in projects that:
Clarity: Keck seeks comprehensive but succinct descriptions of what the research team members will do and exactly how they will do it methodologically. The text should be written for a highly trained audience familiar with reading scientific proposals, but whose members are not necessarily trained in the same field as the applicant. The potential transformative impact of the project should be clear to all readers.
Need: Keck seeks proposals that will convincingly describe why Keck funding is essential, compared to other private funders.
Distinction: Keck likes to see proposals that explain how the team and its approach will be distinct from – and will add improvements to – others in the field. Demonstrating strong awareness of competing and similar research teams nationally and internationally is important.
Benefit: Given the often high-risk nature of transformative rather than incremental projects, it is important to describe the collateral benefits that will be produced by the project across multiple fields, even if the focused, principal aim of the project is not achieved during the grant period.
What Keck Does NOT Want
Projects that are NOT eligible for Keck funding:
For other limitations and additional information, go to: http://www.wmkeck.org/grant-programs/research/eligibility-and-priorities.
ONE-PAGE Abstract Requirements:
In one page only, with a highly trained but lay audience in mind, include the following:
(1) abstract/overview of the research proposed emphasizing any unique aspects;
(2) mention of pilot studies or data, if any – including unpublished findings – that support the idea;
(3) brief description of the key personnel and methodologies;
(4) brief justification of the particular need for Keck’s support; and
(5) estimated budget broken down, if possible, by major areas, e.g., personnel, equipment, consumable supplies, etc. (Budgets can be rough approximations at this stage.)
Researchers are free to add other details (e.g., background to put the research into perspective, description of the institution’s prominence in the field, etc.) if there is room.
Researchers should avoid illustrations in these single-pagers; they will need all the room for text. If a reference is absolutely necessary, abbreviate it as (Science, 323, 45, ’11).
Lucy Grantham, Director of Development II
Emory University, Development and Alumni Relations
Office of Foundation and Corporate Relations
1762 Clifton Road, Suite 1150, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Office: 404.727.4096, Cell: 202-413-1793, Fax: 404.727.4492